People v. Randolph

2025 NY Slip Op 00882
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 13, 2025
Docket2022-02826
StatusPublished

This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 00882 (People v. Randolph) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Randolph, 2025 NY Slip Op 00882 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

People v Randolph (2025 NY Slip Op 00882)
People v Randolph
2025 NY Slip Op 00882
Decided on February 13, 2025
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on February 13, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
COLLEEN D. DUFFY, J.P.
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON
HELEN VOUTSINAS
LAURENCE L. LOVE, JJ.

2022-02826
2022-02827

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Thomas Randolph, appellant. (Ind. Nos. 363/20, 857/20)


Twyla Carter, New York, NY (Frank Xiao of counsel), for appellant.

Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (Johnnette Traill and Ellen C. Abbot of counsel; Damian Jhagroo on the memorandum), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeals by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from two sentences of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Michael Yavinsky, J.), both imposed January 28, 2022, upon his pleas of guilty, on the ground that the sentences were excessive.

ORDERED that the sentences are affirmed.

The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248). The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contention that the sentences imposed were excessive (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d at 255).

DUFFY, J.P., BRATHWAITE NELSON, VOUTSINAS and LOVE, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 NY Slip Op 00882, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-randolph-nyappdiv-2025.