People v. Randolph

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Randolph

250 A.D.2d 378, 673 N.Y.S.2d 306, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5277

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 5, 1998·Published

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered on or about September 4, 1996, resentencing defendant as a persistent felony offender, upon his conviction, after a jury trial, of two counts of robbery in the second degree, to concurrent terms of 25 years to life, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of reducing defendant’s sentences to concurrent terms of 20 years to life.

We find the sentences excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Milonas,' J. P., Williams, Tom, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered on or about September 4, 1996, resentencing defendant as a persistent felony offender, upon his conviction, after a jury trial, of two counts of robbery in the second degree, to concurrent terms of 25 years to life, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of reducing defendant’s sentences to concurrent terms of 20 years to life.

We find the sentences excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Milonas,' J. P., Williams, Tom, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.

People v. Randolph, 250 A.D.2d 378, 673 N.Y.S.2d 306, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5277 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

250 A.D.2d 378 (People v. Randolph) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.