People v. Randazzo
This text of 202 N.E.2d 549 (People v. Randazzo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Judgment affirmed. Defendant-appellant, as a parolee, was deprived of no constitutional rights by the search and seizure which was made under the circumstances of this case (People ex rel. Natoli v. Lewis, 287 N. Y. 478; Anderson v. Corall, 263 U. S. 193).
Concur: Judges' Dye, Van Voorhís, Burke, Scileppi and Bergan. Chief Judge Desmond concurs solely on the ground that the search of the parolee’s apartment was incidental to his arreSt oh a valid administrative warrant; Judge Fuld dissents in the following opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
202 N.E.2d 549, 15 N.Y.2d 526, 254 N.Y.S.2d 99, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 907, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-randazzo-ny-1964.