People v. Randazzo

202 N.E.2d 549, 15 N.Y.2d 526, 254 N.Y.S.2d 99, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 907
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 15, 1964·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinions

Judgment affirmed. Defendant-appellant, as a parolee, was deprived of no constitutional rights by the search and seizure which was made under the circumstances of this case (People ex rel. Natoli v. Lewis, 287 N. Y. 478; Anderson v. Corall, 263 U. S. 193).

Concur: Judges' Dye, Van Voorhís, Burke, Scileppi and Bergan. Chief Judge Desmond concurs solely on the ground that the search of the parolee’s apartment was incidental to his arreSt oh a valid administrative warrant; Judge Fuld dissents in the following opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Randazzo, 202 N.E.2d 549, 15 N.Y.2d 526, 254 N.Y.S.2d 99, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 907 (N.Y. 1964).

202 N.E.2d 549 (People v. Randazzo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Williams
375 So. 2d 364 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1979)
People v. Candelaria
63 A.D.2d 85 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
People v. Ferguson
90 Misc. 2d 467 (New York Supreme Court, 1977)
People v. Fortunato
50 A.D.2d 38 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)
United States v. Lewis
400 F. Supp. 1046 (S.D. New York, 1975)
People v. Santos
82 Misc. 2d 184 (New York Supreme Court, 1975)
State v. Williams
486 S.W.2d 468 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1972)
State v. Cullison
173 N.W.2d 533 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1970)
United States ex rel. Randazzo v. Follette
282 F. Supp. 2 (S.D. New York, 1968)