People v. Rand

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Rand

9 A.D.2d 788, 193 N.Y.S.2d 308, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5902

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 23, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 9 A.D.2d 788 (People v. Rand) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Rand, 9 A.D.2d 788, 193 N.Y.S.2d 308, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5902 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal (1) from a judgment of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, County of Queens, sentencing appellant, after she had been found guilty by the court of violating section 1141 of the Penal Law (obscene prints and articles), to pay a fine of $500 or to serve 30 days, and (2) from each and every intermediate order therein made. Judgment affirmed. No opinion. No separate appeal lies from the intermediate orders, which have been reviewed on the appeal from the judgment of conviction. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek and Hallinan, JJ., concur; Kleinfeld, J., dissents and votes to reverse the judgment and to dismiss the information on the ground that the proof adduced failed to establish appellant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Murphy, J., deceased.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal (1) from a judgment of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, County of Queens, sentencing appellant, after she had been found guilty by the court of violating section 1141 of the Penal Law (obscene prints and articles), to pay a fine of $500 or to serve 30 days, and (2) from each and every intermediate order therein made. Judgment affirmed. No opinion. No separate appeal lies from the intermediate orders, which have been reviewed on the appeal from the judgment of conviction. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek and Hallinan, JJ., concur; Kleinfeld, J., dissents and votes to reverse the judgment and to dismiss the information on the ground that the proof adduced failed to establish appellant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Murphy, J., deceased.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 A.D.2d 788, 193 N.Y.S.2d 308, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rand-nyappdiv-1959.