People v. Ranck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Ranck

267 A.D.2d 496, 698 N.Y.S.2d 917

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 2, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 267 A.D.2d 496 (People v. Ranck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Ranck, 267 A.D.2d 496, 698 N.Y.S.2d 917 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Mathews, J.), rendered June 9, 1998, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of grand larceny in the fourth degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of grand larceny in the fourth degree and was sentenced as a second felony offender to IV2 to 3 years in prison. Upon our review of the record and defense counsel’s brief, we agree with defense counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. The judgment is, accordingly, affirmed, and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see, People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, lv denied 67 NY2d 650).

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Mathews, J.), rendered June 9, 1998, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of grand larceny in the fourth degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of grand larceny in the fourth degree and was sentenced as a second felony offender to IV2 to 3 years in prison. Upon our review of the record and defense counsel’s brief, we agree with defense counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. The judgment is, accordingly, affirmed, and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see, People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, lv denied 67 NY2d 650).

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

267 A.D.2d 496, 698 N.Y.S.2d 917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ranck-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack