People v. Ramsey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Ramsey

104 A.D.2d 388, 478 N.Y.S.2d 714, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19849

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 6, 1984

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 104 A.D.2d 388 (People v. Ramsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Ramsey, 104 A.D.2d 388, 478 N.Y.S.2d 714, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19849 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Moskowitz, J.), dated April 16, 1982, which denied his pro se motion to vacate his judgment of conviction and to set aside his sentence.

Appeal dismissed.

A defendant must obtain permission from a Justice of this court to appeal from an order denying a motion made pursuant to CPL 440.10 or 440.20 (CPL 450.15, 460.15). Defendant has never been granted such leave by this court and, accordingly, his appeal is dismissed. In any event, we note that, on an application to vacate a judgment of conviction the party challenging the conviction’s validity bears the burden of coming forth with allegations sufficient to create an issue of fact (People v Session, 34 NY2d 254). The conclusory allegations presented by defendant herein are insufficient to sustain this burden. Brown, J. P., Rubin, Boyers and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Moskowitz, J.), dated April 16, 1982, which denied his pro se motion to vacate his judgment of conviction and to set aside his sentence.

Appeal dismissed.

A defendant must obtain permission from a Justice of this court to appeal from an order denying a motion made pursuant to CPL 440.10 or 440.20 (CPL 450.15, 460.15). Defendant has never been granted such leave by this court and, accordingly, his appeal is dismissed. In any event, we note that, on an application to vacate a judgment of conviction the party challenging the conviction’s validity bears the burden of coming forth with allegations sufficient to create an issue of fact (People v Session, 34 NY2d 254). The conclusory allegations presented by defendant herein are insufficient to sustain this burden. Brown, J. P., Rubin, Boyers and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

104 A.D.2d 388, 478 N.Y.S.2d 714, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19849, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ramsey-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack