Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Ramsay

People v. Ramsay

120 A.D.3d 719, 990 N.Y.S.2d 891, 2014 NY Slip Op 05902, 2014 WL 4085854, 2014 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5841
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 20, 2014
Docket2011-04340
StatusPublished

This text of 120 A.D.3d 719 (People v. Ramsay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Ramsay, 120 A.D.3d 719, 990 N.Y.S.2d 891, 2014 NY Slip Op 05902, 2014 WL 4085854, 2014 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5841 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Appeals by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from two sentences of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D’Emic, J.), both imposed July 19, 2010, on the ground that the sentences were excessive.

Ordered that the sentences are affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]; People v DeSimone, 80 NY2d 273, 283 [1992]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, contrary to the defendant’s contention, the sentences imposed were not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, PJ., Skelos, Leventhal, Roman and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Callahan
80 N.Y.2d 273 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
120 A.D.3d 719, 990 N.Y.S.2d 891, 2014 NY Slip Op 05902, 2014 WL 4085854, 2014 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ramsay-nyappdiv-2014.