People v. Ramos

2020 NY Slip Op 2863, 183 A.D.3d 448, 121 N.Y.S.3d 851
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Ramos. Read the opinion of the Court — 147 A.D.3d 1462
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 14, 2020·No. 11498 1184/13·Published

Opinion

People v Ramos (2020 NY Slip Op 02863)
People v Ramos
2020 NY Slip Op 02863
Decided on May 14, 2020
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on May 14, 2020
Richter, J.P., Oing, Singh, Moulton, JJ.

11498 1184/13

[*1] The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Larry Ramos, Defendant-Appellant.


Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Robert S. Dean of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Daniel Young of counsel), for respondent.



An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Michael A. Gross, J.), rendered October 11, 2017,

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: MAY 14, 2020

CLERK

Counsel for appellant is referred to

§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate

Division, First Department.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ramos, 2020 NY Slip Op 2863, 183 A.D.3d 448, 121 N.Y.S.3d 851 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

2020 NY Slip Op 2863 (People v. Ramos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431