Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Ramos

People v. Ramos

65 A.D.3d 1264, 885 N.Y.S.2d 427
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Ramos. Read the opinion of the Court — 41 A.D.3d 1250 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 22, 2009·Published

Opinion

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated April 16, 2001 (People v Ramos, 282 AD2d 623 [2001], affd 99 NY2d 27 [2002]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered September 23, 1998.

Ordered that the application is denied.

[1265]*1265The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, P.J., Mastro, Rivera and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ramos, 65 A.D.3d 1264, 885 N.Y.S.2d 427 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

65 A.D.3d 1264 (People v. Ramos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. Barnes
463 U.S. 745 (Supreme Court, 1983)
People v. Ramos
780 N.E.2d 506 (New York Court of Appeals, 2002)
People v. Stultz
810 N.E.2d 883 (New York Court of Appeals, 2004)
People v. Ramos
282 A.D.2d 623 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)