People v. Ramos

26 A.D.3d 197, 808 N.Y.S.2d 897
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Ramos. Read the opinion of the Court — 305 A.D.2d 115

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles J. Tejada, J.), rendered March 31, 2003, as amended April 15, 2005, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first and third degrees, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s challenges to the court’s jury instructions are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review them, we would find that the charge as a whole was balanced and sufficiently conveyed to the jury the appropriate standards by which to evaluate the credibility of the police informant (see People v Inniss, 83 NY2d 653, 659 [1994]; People v McCaskell, 217 AD2d 527, 528 [1995], lv denied 87 NY2d 848 [1995]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ramos, 26 A.D.3d 197, 808 N.Y.S.2d 897 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

26 A.D.3d 197 (People v. Ramos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Inniss
634 N.E.2d 961 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)
People v. McCaskell
217 A.D.2d 527 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)