People v. Ramos

223 A.D.2d 495, 637 N.Y.S.2d 93, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 751
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 30, 1996·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Phylis Skloot Bamberger, J.), entered November 9, 1994, which dismissed, with leave to re-present, the indictment charging defendant with offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree (three counts), falsifying business records in the first degree (three counts), false voter registration, and illegal voting (four counts), unanimously affirmed.

While determination of the charges herein by the Grand Jury hinged upon the definition of the term "residence”, the prosecutor’s instructions to the Grand Jury in that regard did not provide it "with enough information to enable it intelligently to decide whether a crime has been committed and to determine whether there exists legally sufficient evidence to establish the material elements of the crime” (People v Calbud, Inc., 49 NY2d 389, 394-395). Thus, the indictment was properly dismissed, with leave to re-present, on the ground that defendant was prejudiced by the impairment of the integrity of the Grand Jury proceedings (CPL 210.35 [5]; see, People v Darby, 75 NY2d 449, 455). Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Wallach, Nardelli, Williams and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ramos, 223 A.D.2d 495, 637 N.Y.S.2d 93, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 751 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

223 A.D.2d 495 (People v. Ramos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clay v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct.
Nevada Supreme Court, 2013
People v. Pinkoski
188 Misc. 2d 588 (New York County Courts, 2001)
People v. Doe
178 Misc. 2d 908 (New York Supreme Court, 1998)