People v. Ramos

154 A.D.2d 487
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Ramos. Read the opinion of the Court — 139 A.D.2d 775

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Kuffner, J.), rendered November 4, 1987, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Upon our review of the record, it cannot be said that the defendant’s trial counsel did not provide him with meaningful representation (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137). To the extent that the defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel is based upon matters dehors the record, it is not properly before this court on direct appeal from the judgment of conviction (see, People v Kimble, 153 AD2d 591; People v Ramos, 63 NY2d 640, 643). Lawrence, J. P., Rubin, Balletta and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ramos, 154 A.D.2d 487 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

154 A.D.2d 487 (People v. Ramos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Baldi
429 N.E.2d 400 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Ramos
468 N.E.2d 692 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
People v. Kimble
153 A.D.2d 591 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)