People v. Ramos
This text of 94 A.D.2d 708 (People v. Ramos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (DeLury, J.), entered June 18, 1982, which dismissed the defendant’s indictment in the interest of justice. Order reversed, on the law, indictment reinstated and matter remitted to Criminal Term for further proceedings consistent herewith. A motion to dismiss an indictment must be made in writing and upon reasonable notice to the People (CPL 210.45, subd 1; People v Kouzelove, 72 AD2d 608; People v Boynton, 67 AD2d 982). The procedural requirements of CPL 210.45 apply with equal force to a court which is considering the dismissal of an indictment upon its own motion (People v Clayton, 41 AD2d 204; People v Pichkur, 52 AD2d 852; People v Vega, 80 AD2d 867; People v Boynton, supra). The failure of Criminal Term to adhere to the procedural requirements of CPL 210.45 in this case requires reversal of the order appealed from. Titone, J. P., Gibbons, Niehoff and Boyers, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
94 A.D.2d 708, 462 N.Y.S.2d 67, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ramos-nyappdiv-1983.