People v. Ramos

534 N.E.2d 323, 73 N.Y.2d 866, 537 N.Y.S.2d 485, 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 41
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Ramos. Read the opinion of the Court — 70 N.Y.2d 639
New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 17, 1989·Published

Opinion

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), appeal dismissed upon the ground that the Appellate Division’s determination of reversal was not on the law alone or upon the law and such facts which, but for the determination of law, would not have led to reversal (CPL 450.90 [2] [a]). Although the Appellate Division stated that its reversal was on the law, it was based upon a claimed error which was not preserved and does not present a question of law for review by this court (People v Dercole, 52 NY2d 956).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ramos, 534 N.E.2d 323, 73 N.Y.2d 866, 537 N.Y.S.2d 485, 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 41 (N.Y. 1989).

534 N.E.2d 323 (People v. Ramos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Dercole
419 N.E.2d 869 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)