People v. Ramos-Mondroy

2019 NY Slip Op 1136
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 14, 2019
Docket2451/06 8384
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 1136 (People v. Ramos-Mondroy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Ramos-Mondroy, 2019 NY Slip Op 1136 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

People v Ramos-Mondroy (2019 NY Slip Op 01136)
People v Ramos-Mondroy
2019 NY Slip Op 01136
Decided on February 14, 2019
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on February 14, 2019
Renwick, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Oing, Moulton, JJ.

2451/06 8384

[*1] The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Yovany Ramos-Mondroy, Defendant-Appellant.


Christina A. Swarns, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York (Rosemary Herbert of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Samuel Z. Goldfine of counsel), for respondent.



Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael J. Obus, J.), rendered June 29, 2010, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of murder in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 18 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant's challenge to the voluntariness of his plea is unpreserved (see People v Conceicao, 26 NY3d 375, 381 [2015]), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find that the plea was knowing, intelligent and voluntary. At the plea colloquy, there was nothing to warrant an inquiry into whether defendant's mental condition impaired his ability to understand the proceedings. The court specifically noted, based on its own observations, that

defendant appeared to be mentally competent. We find that the record provides no basis for a contrary conclusion.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: FEBRUARY 14, 2019

CLERK



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 1136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ramos-mondroy-nyappdiv-2019.