People v. RAMONEZ
This text of 677 N.W.2d 838 (People v. RAMONEZ) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Patrico RAMONEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 24, 2003 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARKMAN, J., dissents and states as follows:
Because at least two of the reasons given by the trial court in support of its departure from the guidelines were already taken into consideration in determining the appropriate sentence range, and because the trial court did not explain why this consideration was not sufficient, I would remand this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of People v. Babcock, 469 Mich. 247, 666 N.W.2d 231 (2003).
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., joins the statement of MARKMAN, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
677 N.W.2d 838, 469 Mich. 1050, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ramonez-mich-2004.