People v. Ramero

24 A.D.3d 157, 805 N.Y.S.2d 338
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 6, 2005·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel P. FitzGerald, J.), rendered September 18, 2003, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 6 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490 [1987]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning identification and credibility. The discrepancies between defendant’s actual appearance and the description furnished by one of the [158]*158undercover officers who identified him at trial do not warrant a different conclusion. The evidence included reliable identifications by two officers, and a verbal exchange with defendant on the day of his arrest, which the jury could have properly found incriminating. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Marlow, Williams, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ramero, 24 A.D.3d 157, 805 N.Y.S.2d 338 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

24 A.D.3d 157 (People v. Ramero) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Coleman
32 A.D.3d 1239 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)