Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Ralston

People v. Ralston

224 A.D.2d 1035, 638 N.Y.S.2d 383, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1752
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 2, 1996
StatusPublished

This text of 224 A.D.2d 1035 (People v. Ralston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Ralston, 224 A.D.2d 1035, 638 N.Y.S.2d 383, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1752 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: From our review of the record, we conclude that there is no evidence to support defendant’s contention that the photographic identification procedures were impermissibly suggestive (see, People v Byrd, 183 AD2d 773, lv denied 80 NY2d 902). Furthermore, the record at the Wade hearing establishes that each of the victims had an independent source for an in-court identification (see, People v Ballott, 20 NY2d 600, 606-607). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Rath, Jr., J. — Scheme to Defraud, 2nd Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Wesley, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Ballott
233 N.E.2d 103 (New York Court of Appeals, 1967)
Clark v. Canandaigua City School District
80 N.Y.2d 902 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
People v. Byrd
183 A.D.2d 773 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
224 A.D.2d 1035, 638 N.Y.S.2d 383, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ralston-nyappdiv-1996.