Home/New York Court of Appeals/People v. Railey

People v. Railey

655 N.E.2d 394, 85 N.Y.2d 1020, 631 N.Y.S.2d 281, 1995 N.Y. LEXIS 5300
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 14, 1995
StatusPublished

This text of 655 N.E.2d 394 (People v. Railey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Railey, 655 N.E.2d 394, 85 N.Y.2d 1020, 631 N.Y.S.2d 281, 1995 N.Y. LEXIS 5300 (N.Y. 1995).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500,4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed (see, People v Washington, 86 NY2d 189 [decided today]).

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick. Judge Titone dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinions in People v Washington (86 NY2d 189 [decided today]) and People v Carpenter (85 NY2d 1016 [decided today]).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Washington
654 N.E.2d 967 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
People v. Carpenter
654 N.E.2d 1219 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
655 N.E.2d 394, 85 N.Y.2d 1020, 631 N.Y.S.2d 281, 1995 N.Y. LEXIS 5300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-railey-ny-1995.