People v. Rahman
52 A.D.2d 640, 382 N.Y.S.2d 468, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12299
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 26, 1976·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered August 5, 1974, affirmed. The case is remitted to the Criminal Term so that defendant may be sentenced nunc pro tunc on Count No. 15 of the indictment. Defendant was found guilty of Count No. 15 of the indictment, but, due to an oversight and to misinformation provided to it, the trial court neglected to sentence defendant on this count. Accordingly, sentence must be imposed, as of the date of the original sentencing. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Christ, Shapiro, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Rahman, 52 A.D.2d 640, 382 N.Y.S.2d 468, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12299 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).
52 A.D.2d 640 (People v. Rahman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Salvati
70 A.D.2d 646 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
People v. Abdallah
52 A.D.2d 638 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
People v. Raheem
52 A.D.2d 640 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)