People v. Raheem

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Raheem

100 A.D.2d 945, 474 N.Y.S.2d 961, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18082

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 23, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 100 A.D.2d 945 (People v. Raheem) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Raheem, 100 A.D.2d 945, 474 N.Y.S.2d 961, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18082 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Broomer, J.), both rendered November 1, 1982, convicting him of burglary in the second degree (two counts), criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree, grand larceny in the second degree, and possession of burglar tools, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences. 11 Judgments affirmed. 11 We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues that could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Weinstein, Rubin and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Broomer, J.), both rendered November 1, 1982, convicting him of burglary in the second degree (two counts), criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree, grand larceny in the second degree, and possession of burglar tools, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences. 11 Judgments affirmed. 11 We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues that could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Weinstein, Rubin and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 A.D.2d 945, 474 N.Y.S.2d 961, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18082, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-raheem-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack