People v. Ragland

156 A.D.2d 953, 549 N.Y.S.2d 249, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16102
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 20, 1989·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The court’s denial of defendant’s suppression motion is supported by the record and must be affirmed. The police stopped defendant’s car for a suspected traffic violation and noticed a box of bullets in plain view. Under these circumstances the police had the right to order defendant out of the car and frisk him for weapons (see, Pennsylvania v Mimms, 434 US 106). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Kubiniec, J. — attempted criminal possession of weapon, second degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Pine and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ragland, 156 A.D.2d 953, 549 N.Y.S.2d 249, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16102 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

156 A.D.2d 953 (People v. Ragland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lewis
107 A.D.3d 826 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Colyar
2013 IL 111835 (Illinois Supreme Court, 2013)
People v. Lipscomb
179 A.D.2d 1043 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)