People v. Raffa
This text of 173 A.D.2d 748 (People v. Raffa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Friedmann, J.), rendered September 9, 1988, convicting him of arson in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).
We have considered and rejected most of the contentions raised by the defendant upon the appeal by his codefendant Phillip Amato, with whom this defendant was jointly tried (see, People v Amato, 173 AD2d 714 [decided herewith]). The defendant has not raised any arguments requiring a different result.
In addition, we note that we agree with the defendant that the court erred in precluding him from questioning Fire Marshal John Carney regarding a prior inconsistent statement made to him by Joseph Minchella, which, at trial, Minchella denied making (see, Richardson, Evidence, §§ 501, 502 [Prince 10th ed]). However, in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt adduced at the trial, the error was harmless (see, People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230). Bracken, J. P., Kooper, Sullivan and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
173 A.D.2d 748, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-raffa-nyappdiv-1991.