People v. Raduns

70 A.D.3d 1355, 896 N.Y.S.2d 541
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 11, 2010
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 70 A.D.3d 1355 (People v. Raduns) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Raduns, 70 A.D.3d 1355, 896 N.Y.S.2d 541 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Orleans County Court (James P. Punch, J.), rendered November 10, 2008. The judgment convicted defendant, upon her plea of guilty, of burglary in the third degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously modified as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice and on the law by vacating the order of protection in favor of C.S. and as modified the judgment is affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting her upon her plea of guilty of burglary in the third degree (Penal Law § 140.20). Contrary to the contention of defendant, her valid waiver of the right to appeal encompasses her challenge to the severity of the sentence inasmuch as County Court advised defendant of the maximum sentence it could impose before she waived her right to appeal (see People v Lococo, 92 NY2d 825 [1998]). As defendant correctly contends, however, the court had no authority to issue an order of protection in favor of an individual who was neither a victim of the crime nor a witness to the crime to which defendant pleaded guilty (see CPL 530.13 [4] [a]). Although defendant failed to preserve that contention for our review by failing to object to the order of protection on that ground when it was issued (see People v Shampine, 31 AD3d 1163,1164 [2006]), we nevertheless exercise our power to review it as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). The order of protection issued in favor of that individual thus is invalid (see People v Creighton, 298 AD2d 774, 776 [2002]). We therefore modify the judgment by vacating that order of protection. Present—Centra, J.P., Peradotto, Lindley, Pine and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Farrell
158 N.Y.S.3d 720 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
People v. Ortiz
2020 NY Slip Op 3033 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
People v. Hanniford
2019 NY Slip Op 5998 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
People v. Manalang (Werner)
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017
DOLAN, JR., WILLIAM J., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016
People v. Dolan
140 A.D.3d 1681 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
COOKE, ROBERT J., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
People v. Cooke
119 A.D.3d 1399 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Panetta
41 Misc. 3d 614 (Middletown City Court, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
70 A.D.3d 1355, 896 N.Y.S.2d 541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-raduns-nyappdiv-2010.