People v. Racona

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Racona

132 A.D.2d 981, 518 N.Y.S.2d 369, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49452

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 10, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 132 A.D.2d 981 (People v. Racona) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Racona, 132 A.D.2d 981, 518 N.Y.S.2d 369, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49452 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was convicted of unlawful imprisonment in the first degree, robbery in the third degree and arson in the third degree. He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence with respect to each count, but particularly with respect to the arson count, where the evidence was wholly circumstantial. We have reviewed the evidence and find that it was legally sufficient (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490; People v Benzinger, 36 NY2d 29, 32-33). We have examined defendant’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Cayuga County Court, Corning, J.—arson, third degree, and other offenses.) Present— Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Green, Pine and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was convicted of unlawful imprisonment in the first degree, robbery in the third degree and arson in the third degree. He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence with respect to each count, but particularly with respect to the arson count, where the evidence was wholly circumstantial. We have reviewed the evidence and find that it was legally sufficient (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490; People v Benzinger, 36 NY2d 29, 32-33). We have examined defendant’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Cayuga County Court, Corning, J.—arson, third degree, and other offenses.) Present— Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Green, Pine and Lawton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

132 A.D.2d 981, 518 N.Y.S.2d 369, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-racona-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack