People v. Rabinowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Rabinowitz

51 A.D.2d 752, 379 N.Y.S.2d 454, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11296

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 9, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 51 A.D.2d 752 (People v. Rabinowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Rabinowitz, 51 A.D.2d 752, 379 N.Y.S.2d 454, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11296 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered May 6, 1975, convicting him of attempted possession of a weapon, dangerous instrument and appliance, as a felony, upon his plea of guilty, and sentencing him to a one-year term of imprisonment in the New York City Correctional Institution. Judgment modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the sentence to a five-year period of probation. As so modified, judgment affirmed. The case is remanded to the Supreme Court, Queens County, to fix the terms and conditions of probation and for proceedings to direct appellant to surrender himself to said court in order that execution of the judgment be commenced or resumed (CPL 460.50). The sentence was exces[753]*753sive to the extent indicated herein. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Rabin, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered May 6, 1975, convicting him of attempted possession of a weapon, dangerous instrument and appliance, as a felony, upon his plea of guilty, and sentencing him to a one-year term of imprisonment in the New York City Correctional Institution. Judgment modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the sentence to a five-year period of probation. As so modified, judgment affirmed. The case is remanded to the Supreme Court, Queens County, to fix the terms and conditions of probation and for proceedings to direct appellant to surrender himself to said court in order that execution of the judgment be commenced or resumed (CPL 460.50). The sentence was exces[753]*753sive to the extent indicated herein. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Rabin, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A.D.2d 752, 379 N.Y.S.2d 454, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rabinowitz-nyappdiv-1976.