People v. Rabens
This text of 275 A.D.2d 717 (People v. Rabens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The testimony of the complaining witness, a seven-year-old child, was not under oath and was not sufficiently supported by other evidence, as required by section 392 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Cf. People v. Fiorino, 272 App. Div. 1022; People v. Mottolo, 270 App. Div. 769; People v. Croes, 285 N. Y. 279.) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Wenzel and Mae-Crate, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
275 A.D.2d 717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rabens-nyappdiv-1949.