People v. Rabenold
41 N.E.2d 101, 287 N.Y. 832, 1942 N.Y. LEXIS 1834
Opinion
*833 Judgment affirmed; no opinion.
Concur: Finch, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ. Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran and Rippey, JJ., dissent on the ground that sections 304 and 889 of the Penal Law cannot be stretched to cover the acts here charged against the defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Rabenold, 41 N.E.2d 101, 287 N.Y. 832, 1942 N.Y. LEXIS 1834 (N.Y. 1942).
41 N.E.2d 101 (People v. Rabenold) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Smithtown General Hospital
93 Misc. 2d 736 (New York Supreme Court, 1978)
People v. Schwartz
270 A.D. 218 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1945)