People v. Rabenold
41 N.E.2d 101, 287 N.Y. 832, 1942 N.Y. LEXIS 1834
This text of 41 N.E.2d 101 (People v. Rabenold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
People v. Rabenold, 41 N.E.2d 101, 287 N.Y. 832, 1942 N.Y. LEXIS 1834 (N.Y. 1942).
Opinion
*833 Judgment affirmed; no opinion.
Concur: Finch, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ. Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran and Rippey, JJ., dissent on the ground that sections 304 and 889 of the Penal Law cannot be stretched to cover the acts here charged against the defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People v. Smithtown General Hospital
93 Misc. 2d 736 (New York Supreme Court, 1978)
People v. Schwartz
270 A.D. 218 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1945)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
41 N.E.2d 101, 287 N.Y. 832, 1942 N.Y. LEXIS 1834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rabenold-ny-1942.