People v. Raab

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Raab

175 Misc. 2d 287, 669 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1997 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 668

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedNovember 24, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 175 Misc. 2d 287 (People v. Raab) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Raab, 175 Misc. 2d 287, 669 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1997 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 668 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Judgment of conviction unanimously reversed on the law [288]*288and facts and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice and accusatory instrument dismissed.

Defendant was denied his fundamental right to assistance of counsel when the court below refused to grant him a brief adjournment of the trial and he was compelled to represent himself. The inconvenience that would have resulted from a brief adjournment was minimal and the court’s denial of defendant’s request for an adjournment constituted an improvident exercise of discretion.

Inasmuch as the sentence was amended to an unconditional discharge and the charge against defendant was a minor offense, a new trial should not be ordered and the accusatory instrument should be dismissed (People v Burwell, 53 NY2d 849; People v Flynn, 79 NY2d 879; cf., People v Allen, 39 NY2d 916).

Based upon the foregoing, it is unnecessary to consider the remaining contentions.

Stark, J. P., Ingrassia and Floyd, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI