People v. R. N.

246 N.E.2d 536, 23 N.Y.2d 963, 298 N.Y.S.2d 737, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1568
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 19, 1969·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Memorandum. Defendant’s admission “I did it” prior to receiving warning of his constitutional rights was made to police without custodial interrogation ” in response to a question directed to a third person, and accordingly is admissible as a “ volunteered ” statement (People v. Torres, 21 N Y 2d 49, 54; People v. Rodney P. [Anonymous], 21 N Y 2d 1). The courts . below properly found that defendant’s subsequent confession was made after he was fully informed of his constitutional rights

[965] and that defendant affirmatively waived those rights (People v. Stephen J. B., 23 N Y 2d 611, decided herewith).

Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Keating, Breitel and Jasen concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. R. N., 246 N.E.2d 536, 23 N.Y.2d 963, 298 N.Y.S.2d 737, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1568 (N.Y. 1969).

246 N.E.2d 536 (People v. R. N.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Soto
147 Misc. 2d 572 (New York Supreme Court, 1990)
People v. Huffman
41 N.Y. 29 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)