People v. Quiridumbay-Jerez
88 A.D.3d 914, 931 N.Y.2d 249
Opinion
Since the defendant pleaded guilty with the understanding that he would receive the sentence which was thereafter actually imposed, he has no basis now to complain that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Johnson, 81 AD3d 663 [2011]; People v Bunn, 79 AD3d 1143, 1143-1144 [2010]; People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816, 817 [1984]). Mastro, J.P., Balkin, Chambers and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Quiridumbay-Jerez, 88 A.D.3d 914, 931 N.Y.2d 249 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).
88 A.D.3d 914 (People v. Quiridumbay-Jerez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Bunn
79 A.D.3d 1143 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
People v. Johnson
81 A.D.3d 663 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Kazepis
101 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)