People v. Quintero
86 A.D.3d 582, 926 N.Y.2d 903
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 12, 2011·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
[583]*583The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion to be resentenced under the Drug Law Reform Act of 2005 (L 2005, ch 643). In light of the defendant’s extensive criminal history, including violent crimes and crimes committed while the defendant was on parole, substantial justice dictated that the motion be denied (see People v Winfield, 59 AD3d 747 [2009]; People v Curry, 52 AD3d 732 [2008]). Skelos, J.P., Balkin, Leventhal and Lott, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Quintero, 86 A.D.3d 582, 926 N.Y.2d 903 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).
86 A.D.3d 582 (People v. Quintero) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. John
120 A.D.3d 591 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)