People v. Quintero

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Quintero

86 A.D.3d 582, 926 N.Y.2d 903

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 12, 2011

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 86 A.D.3d 582 (People v. Quintero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Quintero, 86 A.D.3d 582, 926 N.Y.2d 903 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

[583]*583The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion to be resentenced under the Drug Law Reform Act of 2005 (L 2005, ch 643). In light of the defendant’s extensive criminal history, including violent crimes and crimes committed while the defendant was on parole, substantial justice dictated that the motion be denied (see People v Winfield, 59 AD3d 747 [2009]; People v Curry, 52 AD3d 732 [2008]). Skelos, J.P., Balkin, Leventhal and Lott, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[583]*583The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion to be resentenced under the Drug Law Reform Act of 2005 (L 2005, ch 643). In light of the defendant’s extensive criminal history, including violent crimes and crimes committed while the defendant was on parole, substantial justice dictated that the motion be denied (see People v Winfield, 59 AD3d 747 [2009]; People v Curry, 52 AD3d 732 [2008]). Skelos, J.P., Balkin, Leventhal and Lott, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

86 A.D.3d 582, 926 N.Y.2d 903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-quintero-nyappdiv-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack