People v. Quinones

8 A.D.3d 501, 778 N.Y.S.2d 293, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8486
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Quinones. Read the opinion of the Court — 5 A.D.3d 1093

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (McCann, J.), rendered November 13, 2002, convicting him of murder in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence, including a videotaped confession, in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, [502]*50260 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Altman, J.P., Smith, Krausman and Skelos, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Quinones, 8 A.D.3d 501, 778 N.Y.S.2d 293, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8486 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

8 A.D.3d 501 (People v. Quinones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)