People v. Quinones

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Quinones

264 A.D.2d 430, 693 N.Y.S.2d 445, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8619

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 9, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 264 A.D.2d 430 (People v. Quinones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Quinones, 264 A.D.2d 430, 693 N.Y.S.2d 445, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8619 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Rock-land County (Nelson, J.), both rendered October 28, 1997, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts) and robbery in the second degree under Indictment No. 97-00156, and robbery in the first degree (two counts) and robbery in the second degree under Indictment No. 97-00157, upon jury verdicts, and imposing sentences. The appeals bring up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony and statements made by him to law enforcement officials.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The hearing court correctly determined that the identification of the defendant by the complainant under Indictment No. 97-00157 was not made as a result of a police-arranged procedure (see, People v Dawson, 185 AD2d 854; People v Malone, 169 AD2d 564).

[431]*431The defendant’s sentences were proper in all respects (see, People v Cabrera, 243 AD2d 720; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. San-tucci, J. P., Krausman, Florio and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Rock-land County (Nelson, J.), both rendered October 28, 1997, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts) and robbery in the second degree under Indictment No. 97-00156, and robbery in the first degree (two counts) and robbery in the second degree under Indictment No. 97-00157, upon jury verdicts, and imposing sentences. The appeals bring up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony and statements made by him to law enforcement officials.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The hearing court correctly determined that the identification of the defendant by the complainant under Indictment No. 97-00157 was not made as a result of a police-arranged procedure (see, People v Dawson, 185 AD2d 854; People v Malone, 169 AD2d 564).

[431]*431The defendant’s sentences were proper in all respects (see, People v Cabrera, 243 AD2d 720; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. San-tucci, J. P., Krausman, Florio and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

264 A.D.2d 430, 693 N.Y.S.2d 445, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-quinones-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack