People v. Quinn
This text of 29 A.D.3d 1021 (People v. Quinn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.), rendered March 10, 2005, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree and robbery in the third degree (two counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that his plea was not voluntarily and intelligently made because his counsel incorrectly advised him as to his conditional release date (see Correction Law § 803 [1]), is based on a matter which is dehors the record and cannot be reached on direct appeal (cf. People v Carlaftes, 216 AD2d 312, 313 [1995]). Miller, J.P., Ritter, Luciano, Spolzino and Dillon, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 A.D.3d 1021, 815 N.Y.S.2d 481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-quinn-nyappdiv-2006.