People v. Quinn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Quinn

6 A.D.3d 1236, 775 N.Y.S.2d 735, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6308

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 30, 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 6 A.D.3d 1236 (People v. Quinn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Quinn, 6 A.D.3d 1236, 775 N.Y.S.2d 735, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6308 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Steuben County Court (Peter C. Bradstreet, J.), rendered August 19, 2002. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted course of sexual conduct against a child in the first degree (two counts).

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: By failing to move to withdraw his plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction, defendant has failed to preserve for our review his contention that his plea was not knowingly, voluntarily or intelligently entered (see People v DeJesus, 248 AD2d 1023 [1998], lv denied 92 NY2d 878 [1998]; see also People v Nixon, 278 AD2d 941 [2000], lv denied 96 NY2d 786 [2001]). In any event, defendant’s contention is without merit. To the extent that the further contention of defendant that he was denied effective assistance of counsel survives his plea of guilty (see People v Cass, 1 AD3d 1025 [2003]; People v Burke, 256 AD2d 1244 [1998], lv denied 93 NY2d 851 [1999]), we conclude that his contention lacks merit (see People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404 [1995]; People v Thompson, 4 AD3d 785 [2004] ). Finally, the sentence is neither unduly harsh nor se[1237]*1237vere. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Pine, Wisner and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Steuben County Court (Peter C. Bradstreet, J.), rendered August 19, 2002. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted course of sexual conduct against a child in the first degree (two counts).

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: By failing to move to withdraw his plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction, defendant has failed to preserve for our review his contention that his plea was not knowingly, voluntarily or intelligently entered (see People v DeJesus, 248 AD2d 1023 [1998], lv denied 92 NY2d 878 [1998]; see also People v Nixon, 278 AD2d 941 [2000], lv denied 96 NY2d 786 [2001]). In any event, defendant’s contention is without merit. To the extent that the further contention of defendant that he was denied effective assistance of counsel survives his plea of guilty (see People v Cass, 1 AD3d 1025 [2003]; People v Burke, 256 AD2d 1244 [1998], lv denied 93 NY2d 851 [1999]), we conclude that his contention lacks merit (see People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404 [1995]; People v Thompson, 4 AD3d 785 [2004] ). Finally, the sentence is neither unduly harsh nor se[1237]*1237vere. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Pine, Wisner and Lawton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 A.D.3d 1236, 775 N.Y.S.2d 735, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-quinn-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack