People v. Quinde

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Quinde

67 A.D.3d 932, 888 N.Y.S.2d 415

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 17, 2009

StatusPublished

This text of 67 A.D.3d 932 (People v. Quinde) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Quinde, 67 A.D.3d 932, 888 N.Y.S.2d 415 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the [933]*933defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Cacace, J.), rendered August 4, 2008, convicting him of bail jumping in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). We note that while the defendant’s brief states that the appeal also is from the judgment rendered under S.C.I. No. 08-00271, the notice of appeal is limited to the judgment rendered under S.C.I. No. 08-00272. Dillon, J.P., Miller, Eng, Hall and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the [933]*933defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Cacace, J.), rendered August 4, 2008, convicting him of bail jumping in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). We note that while the defendant’s brief states that the appeal also is from the judgment rendered under S.C.I. No. 08-00271, the notice of appeal is limited to the judgment rendered under S.C.I. No. 08-00272. Dillon, J.P., Miller, Eng, Hall and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 A.D.3d 932, 888 N.Y.S.2d 415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-quinde-nyappdiv-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack