People v. Quiles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Quiles

32 A.D.2d 557, 300 N.Y.S.2d 533, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4183

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 21, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 32 A.D.2d 557 (People v. Quiles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Quiles, 32 A.D.2d 557, 300 N.Y.S.2d 533, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4183 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered June 26, 1968, convicting him of robbery in the third degree, upon a guilty plea, and sentencing him to an indeterminate prison term of one year and four months to four years. Judgment modified, on the law and facts, by reducing the sentence to the term of one to four years. As so modified, judgment affirmed. An examination of the record reveals a clear promise on the part of the court to impose a sentence commensurate with a conviction for a class E felony. The promised sentence of one to four years was legally within the permissible limits for conviction of the class D felony to which defendant had pleaded guilty; and defendant was entitled to receive the minimum sentence promised by the court. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hopkins, Munder and Martuseello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered June 26, 1968, convicting him of robbery in the third degree, upon a guilty plea, and sentencing him to an indeterminate prison term of one year and four months to four years. Judgment modified, on the law and facts, by reducing the sentence to the term of one to four years. As so modified, judgment affirmed. An examination of the record reveals a clear promise on the part of the court to impose a sentence commensurate with a conviction for a class E felony. The promised sentence of one to four years was legally within the permissible limits for conviction of the class D felony to which defendant had pleaded guilty; and defendant was entitled to receive the minimum sentence promised by the court. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hopkins, Munder and Martuseello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 A.D.2d 557, 300 N.Y.S.2d 533, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-quiles-nyappdiv-1969.