People v. Quezada

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Quezada

170 A.D.2d 248, 565 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1486

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 14, 1991

StatusPublished

This text of 170 A.D.2d 248 (People v. Quezada) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Quezada, 170 A.D.2d 248, 565 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1486 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (George F. Roberts, J. at plea and sentence), rendered June 25, 1987, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of 3 years to life imprisonment, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s failure to challenge the factual sufficiency of the plea allocution by appropriate motion at the trial level, waives the issue on appeal (People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662).

In any event, the record amply demonstrates that there was no factual insufficiency in the plea allocution and that defendant, represented by counsel present in court, entered a knowing and voluntary plea. (Boykin v Alabama, 395 US 238.)

We have considered defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Ellerin, Ross and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (George F. Roberts, J. at plea and sentence), rendered June 25, 1987, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of 3 years to life imprisonment, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s failure to challenge the factual sufficiency of the plea allocution by appropriate motion at the trial level, waives the issue on appeal (People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662).

In any event, the record amply demonstrates that there was no factual insufficiency in the plea allocution and that defendant, represented by counsel present in court, entered a knowing and voluntary plea. (Boykin v Alabama, 395 US 238.)

We have considered defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Ellerin, Ross and Rubin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

170 A.D.2d 248, 565 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-quezada-nyappdiv-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack