People v. Quan

26 A.D.3d 346, 809 N.Y.S.2d 914
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Quan. Read the opinion of the Court — 26 A.D.3d 644

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Aloise, J.), rendered April 28, 2004, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]).

[347]*347The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]), and we decline to review them in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. Crane, J.P., Rivera, Fisher and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Quan, 26 A.D.3d 346, 809 N.Y.S.2d 914 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

26 A.D.3d 346 (People v. Quan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)