People v. Qike Huang

284 A.D.2d 417, 726 N.Y.S.2d 294, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6084
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 11, 2001·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Firetog, J.), rendered September 23, 1999, convicting him of assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the grant, after a hearing (Leventhal, J.), of that branch of the People’s motion which was to suppress an audiotape containing the victim’s conversation with another person.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The hearing court properly suppressed the audiotape containing the victim’s conversation with another person. The evidence adduced at the hearing established that the defendant wiretapped the victim’s telephone. Therefore, the hearing court properly concluded that the audiotape in the defendant’s possession was obtained by means of illegal eavesdropping (see, CPLR 4506; CPL 60.10; People v Capolongo, 85 NY2d 151).

[418] The defendant’s contention that he received ineffective assistance of counsel is without merit (see, People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J. P., Goldstein, Feuerstein and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Qike Huang, 284 A.D.2d 417, 726 N.Y.S.2d 294, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6084 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

284 A.D.2d 417 (People v. Qike Huang) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Bartholomew
2017 NY Slip Op 4132 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Ekstra v. Ekstra
78 A.D.3d 990 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)