People v. Pyatt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Pyatt

104 A.D.2d 501, 479 N.Y.S.2d 159, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19942

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 27, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 104 A.D.2d 501 (People v. Pyatt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Pyatt, 104 A.D.2d 501, 479 N.Y.S.2d 159, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19942 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeals by defendant (1) from two judgments of the County Court, Nassau County (Lawrence, J.), both rendered March 5, 1982, convicting him of burglary in the second degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences; and (2) from an amended judgment of the same court also rendered March 5, 1982, upon the revocation of a previously imposed sentence of probation.

Judgments and amended judgment affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on these appeals. Counsel is granted leave to withdraw (see Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Brown, J. P., Rubin, Boyers and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeals by defendant (1) from two judgments of the County Court, Nassau County (Lawrence, J.), both rendered March 5, 1982, convicting him of burglary in the second degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences; and (2) from an amended judgment of the same court also rendered March 5, 1982, upon the revocation of a previously imposed sentence of probation.

Judgments and amended judgment affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on these appeals. Counsel is granted leave to withdraw (see Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Brown, J. P., Rubin, Boyers and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

104 A.D.2d 501, 479 N.Y.S.2d 159, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19942, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-pyatt-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack