People v. Purvis
This text of 48 A.D.3d 595 (People v. Purvis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Griffin, J.), rendered August 10, 2005, convicting him of assault in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
[596]*596Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel when counsel failed to request a hearing with respect to the defendant’s failure to complete a drug rehabilitation program as required by his plea agreement. The defendant’s contention is without merit (see Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668 [1984]; People v McDonald, 1 NY3d 109 [2003]). The record shows that the defendant freely admitted to leaving the program without permission and against clinical advice, and his vague assertions about the “climate” of the program, without more, did not warrant a hearing (see People v Valencia, 3 NY3d 714 [2004]; cf. People v Jackson, 272 AD2d 342 [2000]). In any event, the record further shows that after the court had clearly explained to the defendant that it would afford him the opportunity for a hearing, the defendant voluntarily waived the opportunity. Mastro, J.P., Fisher, Florio, Angiolillo and Dickerson, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
48 A.D.3d 595, 849 N.Y.S.2d 898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-purvis-nyappdiv-2008.