People v. Purrell

234 A.D.2d 484, 651 N.Y.S.2d 902, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13112

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.), rendered May 12, 1993, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

A review of the record reveals that the defendant received the effective assistance of counsel (see, Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668, 692; People v Flores, 84 NY2d 184, 187; People v Garcia, 75 NY2d 973, 974; People v Mahboubian, 74 NY2d 174, 183).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]), or do not warrant reversal in light of the overwhelming evidence of his guilt (see, People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230). Bracken, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Purrell, 234 A.D.2d 484, 651 N.Y.S.2d 902, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13112 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

234 A.D.2d 484 (People v. Purrell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)
People v. Flores
639 N.E.2d 19 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)
People v. Crimmins
326 N.E.2d 787 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Mahboubian
543 N.E.2d 34 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)
People v. Garcia
555 N.E.2d 902 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)