Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Purifoy

People v. Purifoy

195 A.D.2d 954, 602 N.Y.S.2d 566, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7728
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 16, 1993
StatusPublished

This text of 195 A.D.2d 954 (People v. Purifoy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Purifoy, 195 A.D.2d 954, 602 N.Y.S.2d 566, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7728 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s conviction of robbery in the second degree and grand larceny in the fourth degree was supported by legally sufficient evidence and the verdict was not contrary to the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). Trial counsel’s representation of defendant, viewed in its entirety, provided defendant with effective assistance of counsel (see, People v Satterfield, 66 NY2d 796, 798-799; People v Arnold, 188 AD2d 1020).

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, LaMendola, J.—Robbery, 2nd Degree.) Present —Denman, P. J., Balio, Lawton, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Satterfield
488 N.E.2d 834 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. Arnold
188 A.D.2d 1020 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
195 A.D.2d 954, 602 N.Y.S.2d 566, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-purifoy-nyappdiv-1993.