People v. Punter

41 A.D.3d 320, 837 N.Y.S.2d 563

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John N. Byrne, J., at plea; John E Collins, J., at sentence), rendered January 26, 2006, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a [321]*321controlled substance in or near school grounds, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 472 to 9 years, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of vacating the DNA databank fee, and otherwise affirmed.

We perceive no basis upon which to reduce defendant’s conviction to a lesser offense, since “we do not consider it appropriate to do so for the purpose of granting dispensations from mandatory sentencing statutes” (People v Velasquez, 25 AD3d 501 [2006], lv denied 6 NY3d 854 [2006]).

As the People concede, since the crime was committed prior to the effective date of the legislation (Penal Law § 60.35 [1] [a] [v] [former (1) (e)]), providing for the imposition of a DNA databank fee, that fee should not have been imposed. Concur— Tom, J.P., Saxe, Williams and Malone, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Punter, 41 A.D.3d 320, 837 N.Y.S.2d 563 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

41 A.D.3d 320 (People v. Punter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Velasquez
25 A.D.3d 501 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)