People v. Pullins

138 A.D.3d 1082, 28 N.Y.S.3d 914

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Guzman, J.), dated June 5, 2014, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

By order dated June 5, 2014, the Supreme Court, after a hearing, designated the defendant a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C. The defendant appeals.

The Supreme Court did not err in assessing points to the defendant based on his youthful offender adjudication (see People v Scott, 136 AD3d 675 [2016]; People v Francis, 137 AD3d 91 [2016]). Further, the court did not err in assessing points to the defendant based on his sexual misconduct while incarcerated. Moreover, the court properly determined that the defendant was not entitled to a downward departure (see People v Wortham, 119 AD3d 666 [2014]). Accordingly, the court properly designated the defendant a level three sex offender.

Mastro, J.P., Leventhal, Sgroi and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Pullins, 138 A.D.3d 1082, 28 N.Y.S.3d 914 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

138 A.D.3d 1082 (People v. Pullins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Wortham
119 A.D.3d 666 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Francis
137 A.D.3d 91 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Scott
136 A.D.3d 675 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)