People v. Pullin
97 A.D.3d 766, 947 N.Y.2d 909
Opinion
[767]*767Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court did not err in enhancing the defendant’s sentence based on her violation of the plea agreement (see People v Andrews, 62 AD3d 1237, 1239 [2009]; People v King, 309 AD2d 820 [2003]). Angiolillo, J.P., Dickerson, Leventhal and Chambers, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Pullin, 97 A.D.3d 766, 947 N.Y.2d 909 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).
97 A.D.3d 766 (People v. Pullin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Andrews
62 A.D.3d 1237 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
People v. King
309 A.D.2d 820 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)