People v. Pullano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Pullano

185 A.D.2d 628, 587 N.Y.S.2d 875, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9154

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 14, 1992

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 185 A.D.2d 628 (People v. Pullano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Pullano, 185 A.D.2d 628, 587 N.Y.S.2d 875, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9154 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: By pleading guilty, defendant forfeited his claim that the Grand Jury proceedings were defective because evidence obtained pursuant to an unlawful wiretap (see, People v Chiarenza, 185 AD2d 679 [decided herewith]; Peo[629]*629ple v Candella, 171 AD2d 329) was presented to the Grand Jury (see, People v Kazmarick, 52 NY2d 322, 326).

We decline defendant’s request that we modify, in the interest of justice, the one-year imprisonment term imposed by the sentencing court. (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J.—Conspiracy, 3rd Degree.) Present —Denman, P. J., Pine, Balio, Fallon and Doerr, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: By pleading guilty, defendant forfeited his claim that the Grand Jury proceedings were defective because evidence obtained pursuant to an unlawful wiretap (see, People v Chiarenza, 185 AD2d 679 [decided herewith]; Peo[629]*629ple v Candella, 171 AD2d 329) was presented to the Grand Jury (see, People v Kazmarick, 52 NY2d 322, 326).

We decline defendant’s request that we modify, in the interest of justice, the one-year imprisonment term imposed by the sentencing court. (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J.—Conspiracy, 3rd Degree.) Present —Denman, P. J., Pine, Balio, Fallon and Doerr, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

185 A.D.2d 628, 587 N.Y.S.2d 875, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-pullano-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack