People v. Pullano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Pullano

185 A.D.2d 628, 587 N.Y.S.2d 875, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9154

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 14, 1992·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: By pleading guilty, defendant forfeited his claim that the Grand Jury proceedings were defective because evidence obtained pursuant to an unlawful wiretap (see, People v Chiarenza, 185 AD2d 679 [decided herewith]; Peo[629] ple v Candella, 171 AD2d 329) was presented to the Grand Jury (see, People v Kazmarick, 52 NY2d 322, 326).

We decline defendant’s request that we modify, in the interest of justice, the one-year imprisonment term imposed by the sentencing court. (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J.—Conspiracy, 3rd Degree.) Present —Denman, P. J., Pine, Balio, Fallon and Doerr, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: By pleading guilty, defendant forfeited his claim that the Grand Jury proceedings were defective because evidence obtained pursuant to an unlawful wiretap (see, People v Chiarenza, 185 AD2d 679 [decided herewith]; Peo[629] ple v Candella, 171 AD2d 329) was presented to the Grand Jury (see, People v Kazmarick, 52 NY2d 322, 326).

We decline defendant’s request that we modify, in the interest of justice, the one-year imprisonment term imposed by the sentencing court. (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J.—Conspiracy, 3rd Degree.) Present —Denman, P. J., Pine, Balio, Fallon and Doerr, JJ.

People v. Pullano, 185 A.D.2d 628, 587 N.Y.S.2d 875, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9154 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

185 A.D.2d 628 (People v. Pullano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related