People v. Puglisi

201 A.D.3d 1367, 158 N.Y.S.3d 719, 2022 NY Slip Op 00607
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 28, 2022
Docket1142 KA 19-00500
StatusPublished

This text of 201 A.D.3d 1367 (People v. Puglisi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Puglisi, 201 A.D.3d 1367, 158 N.Y.S.3d 719, 2022 NY Slip Op 00607 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

People v Puglisi (2022 NY Slip Op 00607)
People v Puglisi
2022 NY Slip Op 00607
Decided on January 28, 2022
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on January 28, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, NEMOYER, AND CURRAN, JJ.

1142 KA 19-00500

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

JOSEPH PUGLISI, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.


THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (DEBORAH K. JESSEY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

JOHN J. FLYNN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (MICHAEL J. HILLERY OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Kenneth F. Case, J.), rendered November 7, 2018. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of grand larceny in the fourth degree (four counts) and petit larceny (six counts).

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of four counts of grand larceny in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 155.30 [1]) and six counts of petit larceny (§ 155.25), defendant contends that he did not validly waive his right to appeal and that his sentence is unduly harsh and severe. Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant's waiver of the right to appeal is invalid (see People v Bisono, 36 NY3d 1013, 1017-1018 [2020]; People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545, 565-566 [2019], cert denied — US &mdash, 140 S Ct 2634 [2020]), and thus does not preclude our review of his challenge to the severity of his sentence (see People v Baker, 158 AD3d 1296, 1296 [4th Dept 2018], lv denied 31 NY3d 1011 [2018]), we conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: January 28, 2022

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431
§ 155.30
New York PEN § 155.30

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
201 A.D.3d 1367, 158 N.Y.S.3d 719, 2022 NY Slip Op 00607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-puglisi-nyappdiv-2022.